Wishy-Washy Supreme Court
What We Expect vs What We Get
Hi friends,
I’m sure some of you are a bit frustrated with the Supreme Court - as I am.
I was looking up this DOGE case, and I asked AI if it could tell if there was a logical way the ruling might go. The answer I got kind of confirms how wishy washy the court has been lately.
"Recent Supreme Court behavior indicates incrementalism, institutional caution, and strategic restraint… The court might:
Grant a partial stay or narrow ruling to kick the can down the road,
Suggest the issue is not ripe or not yet fully developed,
Leave the door open for future litigation under a different pretext."
So, in other words, don’t hold your breath.
I did find the information on the justices’ personalities interesting.
⚖️ What Citizens Expect from the Court(s)
Americans— especially those grounded in constitutional values — generally expect the Supreme Court to:
Uphold the original meaning of the Constitution rather than reinterpret it based on shifting societal trends.
Draw clear boundaries for what government can and cannot do — especially in areas like federal overreach, free speech, and religious freedom.
Decide cases plainly and promptly, without hiding behind procedural loopholes or vague language.
Push back on unelected bureaucracies and restore power to the people’s elected representatives.
Avoid political gamesmanship and appear above the partisan fray.
🔹 In short: Citizens expect courage, clarity, and consistency — not clever avoidance.
🧠 Why SCOTUS Sometimes Appears “Wishy-Washy”
The Court doesn’t always meet public expectations, often because it’s operating under a different logic — one rooted in legal precedent, institutional restraint, and procedural caution.
Their reasons may include:
Protecting the Court’s perceived neutrality: Especially under Chief Justice John Roberts, who tries to avoid 5–4 partisan-looking decisions.
Avoiding broad precedents that could create unintended ripple effects.
Waiting for better test cases: Some justices want a cleaner factual record or clearer statutory conflict before ruling broadly.
Limiting backlash: The Court occasionally rules narrowly to avoid political firestorms or challenges to its legitimacy.
🔹 Criticism: Many Americans — on both sides — now believe that too much caution has eroded trust rather than preserved it. (Do the reasons sound political to you? They do to me.)
🧑⚖️ Judicial Personalities and Patterns
⚖️ Chief Justice John Roberts
Cautious institutionalist: More concerned with how the Court is viewed than securing ideological wins.
Known for surprising left-leaning votes (e.g., Obamacare, census, DACA) to “protect” the Court’s image.
⚖️ Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Originalist but methodical: Doesn't always go for sweeping decisions.
Surprised some conservatives by refusing to overturn major precedents quickly, especially in religious liberty and administrative law.
⚖️ Justice Neil Gorsuch
Strong textualist and libertarian streak. Willing to rule broadly if the Constitution demands it.
Frequently aligns with Thomas on limiting federal power.
⚖️ Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Often the centrist of the conservative bloc, concerned with precedent and balance.
May hedge rulings to preserve public or congressional relationships.
⚖️ Justice Clarence Thomas
The most consistent originalist.
Bold in written opinions, often inviting the Court to revisit settled precedents.
⚖️ Justice Samuel Alito
Sharp, direct, and clear constitutional voice.
Particularly strong on religious freedom, First Amendment, and election-related decisions.
⚖️ Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson
Generally align with liberal interpretations, especially on civil rights, abortion, and regulatory authority.
Kagan tries to build consensus when possible.
Sotomayor writes emotionally charged dissents.
Jackson leans activist, particularly on racial equity and administrative law.
➡️ Real question: Does SCOTUS have the will to clearly define modern executive powers — or will it punt again? (I bet you a chocolate chip cookie that it will punt.)
As always, do your own research; make up your own mind.
References to other sources do not necessarily reflect my opinions, and I make no claim to their veracity or completeness. I provide them for your consideration.
(AI was used in this article.)
God bless you, God bless President Trump and team, and God bless America!
Stay calm - President Trump is a businessman who operates strategically, and not everything will make sense at first. His plan to shrink government and Make America Great Again is a process, not an overnight fix. Trust the long game, not just the headlines.
This message reflects my personal perspective on current events. While I strive for accuracy, please verify details through official sources linked above. If sharing, I encourage readers to include this disclaimer to ensure clarity.
United we stand. Divided we fall. We must not let America fall.
VoteTexas.gov, https://www.votetexas.gov/get-involved/index.html
Until next time…
Please share your thoughts in the comments. Or email me, and let’s have a problem-solving conversation. I hope we can create a caucus with positive, back-to-the-founders’-dream-for-America results. Have a topic you want to know more about?
Some housekeeping…
Going forward, you may need to check your spam folder. And please mark this address as ‘not spam.’ If the newsletter isn’t in your spam folder either, you should look in the Promotions tab.
You can always see everything on the website, RationalAmerican.org.
Thanks again for reading! I’m glad you’re here!