Hi friends,
Maybe you’ve heard.
The United States seems to have secured a substantial economic and strategic interest in the private company developing fields of oil in Venezuela, along with preferential access to future oil production.
Yes, another ‘Trump deal’ that is working to set America’s path forward for the future. (Interesting that the time it will take for his ‘deals’ to come to fruition means someone else will get the credit.)
The headline number is enormous: more than 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves are associated with the Venezuelan fields covered by the arrangement.
That doesn’t mean America bought 65 billion barrels of oil. Venezuela still owns its natural resources.
Here’s where we are
The central private company is North American Blue Energy Partners, or NABEP, which already operates oil fields in Venezuela.
Under the arrangement announced by the Trump administration:
NABEP has development rights involving 17 Venezuelan oil fields containing about 65 billion barrels of proven reserves.
The U.S. government holds warrants giving it rights associated with a 35% economic interest in NABEP’s parent company.
The U.S. is entitled to buy about 20% of NABEP’s production at production cost.
The United States also has preferential rights involving much of the remaining production.
The U.S. position is reportedly protected from being diluted as NABEP raises additional investment capital.
NABEP says the overall development could eventually involve nearly $100 billion in investment.
Importantly, that $100 billion is a planned or anticipated investment figure. It does not mean $100 billion has already been financed and committed.
Chevron is also moving ahead separately with more than $7 billion in planned Venezuelan investment, aiming to substantially increase its own production there over the next several years.
Other international energy and infrastructure companies are entering as well.
How could this help the United States?
The first benefit is obvious: energy security.
Venezuelan oil is geographically much closer to the United States than Middle Eastern oil. It also gives the U.S. another major potential supply source at a time when events around the Strait of Hormuz continue to demonstrate how vulnerable global oil flows can be to war and political instability.
There is also a refining advantage.
Much of Venezuela’s oil is very heavy crude. That makes production and transportation more complicated, but the United States — especially the Gulf Coast — has some of the world’s best refinery infrastructure for processing heavy crude.
If Venezuelan production increases significantly, more of that oil could flow to American refineries.
The deal also has a geopolitical side. Some of the fields now shifting toward NABEP were previously associated with Chinese and Russian interests. Greater U.S. influence over Venezuelan energy therefore potentially reduces Chinese and Russian economic influence in the Western Hemisphere.
And if the arrangement works as planned, the United States could eventually benefit financially through its economic interest in NABEP, preferential oil-purchase rights, and possibly dividends.
It’s a work in progress
Two questions stand out.
First: Will the investment actually materialize?
Venezuela’s oil infrastructure has deteriorated badly over many years. Increasing production will require drilling rigs, pipelines, electricity, ports, storage, upgrading equipment and substantial private capital.
Announcing $100 billion in future investment is one thing.
Actually raising it and building the infrastructure is another.
Chevron’s willingness to commit billions is encouraging, but rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industry will take years, not months.
Second: How durable is the deal legally and politically?
The White House has described some of NABEP’s rights as lasting as long as 100 years, while Venezuelan officials have referred to 25-year licenses.
There are also still unanswered questions about the exact legal structure of the U.S. government’s 35% interest and whether any federal loan guarantees or other taxpayer-backed financial exposure accompany the arrangement.
Those issues mean details are still being worked out or have not yet been made public.
One number worth clearing up
Early reporting created considerable confusion.
The figure is 65 billion barrels of proven reserves. Not 65 billion gallons. Or 65 billion barrels of annual production.
And another widely circulated number — roughly $200 billion — refers to estimated Venezuelan royalties and taxes over about 25 years, not $200 billion every year.
If all goes well…
If the investment arrives, the contracts hold, and Venezuela’s infrastructure can be rebuilt, the United States could gain something genuinely significant:
a large new Western Hemisphere energy supply, preferential access to potentially inexpensive oil, greater use of American refineries, reduced Chinese and Russian influence in Venezuela, a valuable financial interest in the company developing the resources, and greater resilience against future disruptions in Middle Eastern oil supplies.
It could also help restore Venezuela’s badly damaged oil industry and economy.
Those are substantial potential benefits.
Time will tell
This is much more than a routine oil-purchase agreement, and it could eventually become one of the more consequential energy arrangements the United States has made in decades.
But 65 billion barrels underground are not the same thing as 65 billion barrels produced.
The oil must be developed. The money must be raised. Infrastructure must be rebuilt. Contracts must survive political changes. And several important legal and financial details still need clarification.
So this is one to watch with cautious optimism.
The potential upside for the United States is enormous.
Sources:
White House fact sheet - administration claims and terms
Reuters - US structured Venezuela oil position to protect it from dilution, official says
Reuters - Venezuela’s heavy crude could be swapped for American oil to fill emergency reserve, Wright says
Reuters - on Chevron’s $7+ billion investment and production plans.
The OSC statute - legal-authority source
Financial Times - 25-year vs. 100-year Venezuelan contract question.
As always, do your own research and make up your own mind.
White paper on land and water rights: Property Rights and Freedom: A White Paper on America’s Disappearing Land (8/13/2025)
United we stand. Divided we fall. We must not let America fall.
VoteTexas.gov, https://www.votetexas.gov/get-involved/index.html
Disclaimer:
As always, do your own research and make up your own mind. This Substack is provided for informational and commentary purposes only. All claims or statements are based on publicly available sources and are presented as analysis and opinion, not legal conclusions.
No assertion is made of unlawful conduct by any individual, company, or government entity unless such claims are supported by formal public records or verified legal documents. The views expressed here reflect my personal perspective on property rights and land use issues.
While I strive for accuracy and transparency, readers are encouraged to verify all details using the official sources and references provided. Any references to third-party material are included solely for your consideration and do not necessarily reflect my views or imply endorsement.
If you share this content, please include this disclaimer to preserve context and clarity for all readers.
Until next time…
Please share your thoughts in the comments. Or email me, and let’s have a problem-solving conversation. I welcome ‘letters to the editor’ type emails and may publish yours. I hope we can create a caucus with positive, back-to-the-founders’-dream-for-America results. Have a topic you want to know more about?
Some housekeeping…
Going forward, you may need to check your spam folder. And please mark this address as ‘not spam.’ If the newsletter isn’t in your spam folder either, you should look in the Promotions tab.
You can always see everything on the website, RationalAmerican.org.
Thanks again for reading! I’m glad you’re here!